A Question; Strategic Management vs. Strategic Planning, what’s the difference?

14 May

Its not always a clear cut between pebbles, some are white some are brown, but who gets to wear the crown?

In both strategic, and academic circles, we all strive for the maintaining of the highest standards of intellectual thought; especially when referring to the philosophy of strategy. In plain English – it’s all about perception as we deal with philosophy, and any philosophy changes constantly; or should…thereby influencing strategy directly as a result.

Thus “philosophy”; both in the business and strategic sense dictates when it becomes BUSINESS PHILOSOPHY, and then as a result also becomes a STRATEGY OR STRATEGIC.

When the basic of “FORMING STRATEGY“,  is met, and the elements of  strategy become apparent, then we should have;

  • a vision,
  • a mission,
  • goals,
  • and action plans…
  • then we refer to something as being or becoming Strategic; or as STRATEGIC PLANNING.

1)Strategic plans are made up of action plans;

Where Action Planning deals with;

Who What Where When How How much
Responsibility Objectives Location Time/ frame Goals Quantity/ cost

2)Now we get to Strategic Management, it in turn gives us a required business perspective; a business perspective is the organisation of all activities, in a structured manner. We want to or need to organise things, in order to be able to measure and gauge things like our; performance, progress and quality, all whilst these strategic plans unfold, into smaller action plans,and then into finality.

The whole purpose of management is to add;

  • structure,
  • process,
  • procedures,
  • policy,
  • resources,
  • and organisation.

All in order to connect all the resources, with systems, and get results in the form of products or services, that impacts on other initiative, activities, and plans, that then starts coinciding with the business model, and plan, and its ideology, to make all its aims happen.

Management as a process; becomes systematically inclined and also procedural, it steers these “action plans”, or “strategic plans” with intent, that are otherwise in effect just seen as dead pieces of paper, which needs to be interpreted, and given life. Management becomes this means.  By combining ideas, with effort, substance starts to emerge with an expected resolve or end state,, coming from some place, somewhere between practical and philosophical – dealing with all aspects between knowledge and wisdom, then when backed up with factual relevance – then we are seen to manage.

Describing management and actually doing it is difficult, it becomes two worlds, as we all experience life from different angles, and levels of difficulty. Never-the-less, it’s these “words” that we use, that should unite us in mind and effort to perform the same functions. Therefore it’s very essential that we find the same meaning in terminology so that we may all benefit from both the knowledge and the wisdom it brings.

Then only will we know the true distinction – or difference – between them, planning and management.

Very philosophical, yes that’s the point. It somehow never becomes a simple enough explanation, when we just take out the words strategic, and try and deduce some common meaning. When in fact, planning and management are two very different animals.

Then we are only left with, management and planning. There you have it sweet and short, straight to the point. The one is all about management the other planning, or is it?

Some will argue that these terms do not exist at all; People try and get way to clever (and Philosophical) for their own good. then this happens, then you get aspects arising like; Strategic management vs. strategic planning, what’s the difference?

This can be attributed to the relationship between words and their meanings, that also become culturally significant, and extremely complicated when we want to take or when taken to literally. For instance; if we take the literal meaning of the words used and get their synonyms, then Strategic means planned”, then that would in fact imply that you can’t come up with something like “planned planning” or can you, what does that mean or imply anyway?…  Nor could you tell if it is still the same thing? Then Strategic planning should have a significant meaning if we choose to explain something significant by merging these two words, should it not?

When in doubt, we should also look at a words connotation; thus implying – what is suggested as well as its denotation – what our intellect tells us it should imply, and then we will know what we are looking at.

This aspect belongs to the field of semantics. For now though, what you need to know is that words do not have single or even simple meanings – they have implicit meaning.

Traditionally, grammarians have referred to the meanings of words in two parts: their;

  1. Denotation; referring to the literal meaning of the word
  2. Connotation; referring to a relationship to the word either emotional or otherwise; something which the word evokes in people…

1) Strategic + Planning;

  • As a denotation; Strategic; literally means – planned.
  • As a connotation; Strategic; implies – organised or deliberate actions…
  • As a denotation; Planning; literally means – preparation
  • As a connotation; Planning; implies – scheduling or setting up

So if we connect the two words now; we get strategic planning meaning or implying;

  • As a denotation = Planned preparation
  • As a connotation; = Organised / deliberate – preparation or setting up

2) Strategic  + Management;

  • As a denotation; it implies supervision
  • As a connotation; it implies organised, or administration
  • Strategic Management; as a denotation; planned supervision; and levels of supervision, or hierarchy in business
  • Strategic Management; as a connotation; deliberate organisation of actions – The deliberate preparation then of actions consistent with organisation…



Here we go..  Strategic + planning; implies; planned or deliberate preparation then

                              Strategic + management; implies planned supervision or administration 

So yes, they are still two totally different animals

And then you also get Grand Strategy  and Business formation

Get my new book here; its pumped with strategic relevance;   


About these ads

10 Responses to “A Question; Strategic Management vs. Strategic Planning, what’s the difference?”

  1. Moncler Sito Ufficiale November 10, 2011 at 4:29 pm #

    Excellent write-up!

  2. Moncler November 28, 2011 at 7:12 pm #

    It’s all awesome and also beneficial data. I am happy that you simply discussed this kind of helpful info for free. Make sure you keep us current, Thank you for your discussions.

  3. Stewart Figler November 29, 2011 at 1:19 am #

    NICE

  4. Aimer Shama July 28, 2013 at 9:12 pm #

    Outstanding job, I am in love with the impartial view coupled with the linguistic breakdown approach. I am citing you in my HR thesis, sir. :)

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Most Strategies come with both Moral and Ethical Dangers today… « Strategic Management - November 1, 2011

    [...] STRATEGY IS THIS THAT'S PLYING OUT GLOBALLY TODAY, that just [...]

  2. Index of posts on this blog – Strategic Management « Strategic Management - July 2, 2012

    [...] A Question; Strategic Management vs. Strategic Planning, what’s the difference? [...]

  3. Strategic Management and Planning Concept Development « Strategic Management - December 2, 2012

    [...] planning; is a deliberate process, structured to achieve specific outcomes with, one of which is a strategic plan in its simplest form, where as a Grand Strategy has several strategies in its most complex form. [...]

  4. Strategy without a solid corner stone, sociology – will become a mental stonewall, built with only bias and denial. « Strategic Management - December 10, 2012

    [...] – Neglect and conformity; most strategies get neglected after or past 5 years, planning and management for repair and maintenance, and implementation of policy and procedure, to keep this from [...]

  5. Strategy and leadership development will be the two cardinal keys to future survival of organisations « Strategic Management - December 11, 2012

    [...] thinking – problem solving – that can be complimented with actual strategic skills – planning, and our talents – to communicate effectively, our ability to inspire leadership…taking [...]

  6. Fostering proper Command and Control Management and or Leadership styles are impossible without a doctrine. | Strategic Management - March 10, 2013

    [...] Since, the entire situation cannot be communicated in detail to everyone, all day, and in real time, it is important to understand what elements are the most important form of communicating, to the decision-making process. If we inform of “elements”, and they in turn, inform of “attributers”, then that will make up the entire picture – in this manner. This is referred to as strategic management. There exist a clear difference between strategic planning, and strategic management. [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,576 other followers

%d bloggers like this: